Model Number 4674 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Positioning Problem (3009); High Capture Threshold (3266)
|
Patient Problem
Vascular Dissection (3160)
|
Event Date 04/25/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that left ventricular (lv) lead was not successfully implanted due to placement difficulty and difficult to retract.The physician had difficulty pulling back the lead into the coronary sinus past a primary bifurcation.The physician did several excessive manipulations of the catheter to return the lead back to the coronary sinus.After the lead was removed the scrub tech noticed excessive tissue on the fins of the lead.Additional contrast was when injected to look for new potential lead placements and it was noted that a potential dissection had taken place.The lead was never in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information received from the field indicated that it was not known if the lead was the exact cause of dissection.However, there was no additional intervention done for the dissection.Furthermore, a high capture of thresholds was observed resulting in the removal of the lead.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product has been received for analysis.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product has been received for analysis.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental report will be filed.Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, a thorough evaluation of the lead was performed.Detailed analysis did not confirm high-capture-threshold based on normal lead resistance measurements, a passing hipot test and inspection which showed no conductor issues.However, difficult to position and difficult-to-remove allegation was confirmed due to tissue noted on the lead near the tip as was mentioned in the complaint.Furthermore, known inherent risk conclusion was based on the direct observation of tissue entwined near the tip.Susceptibility of lead tips (both active and passive) to snagging tissue is a known risk.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that left ventricular (lv) lead was not successfully implanted due to placement difficulty and difficult to retract.The physician had difficulty pulling back the lead into the coronary sinus past a primary bifurcation.The physician did several excessive manipulations of the catheter to return the lead back to the coronary sinus.After the lead was removed the scrub tech noticed excessive tissue on the fins of the lead.Additional contrast was when injected to look for new potential lead placements and it was noted that a potential dissection had taken place.The lead was never in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information received from the field indicated that it was not known if the lead was the exact cause of dissection.However, there was no additional intervention done for the dissection.Furthermore, a high capture of thresholds was observed resulting in the removal of the lead.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|