• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT FX DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT FX DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number D-EVOLUTFX-2329
Device Problems Difficult to Insert (1316); Failure to Advance (2524); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Cardiac Arrest (1762); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Rupture (2208); Asystole (4442); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/16/2023
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that following the implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, when withdrawing the delivery c atheter system (dcs), the nosecone caught on the valve.Subsequently, the valve dislodged into the aorta.An attempt at a second valve was made but the dcs could not pass through the first valve.In result, abdominal aortic damage occurred.Subsequently, hemorrhaging was observed.The patient was placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ecmo), and a catheter stent graft was performed to achieve hemostasis.Subsequently, asystole was observed, and the patient died.The cause of death was not provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: evolutfx-26, product analysis: the dcs was not returned and the valve remains implanted, therefore no product analysis can be performed.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.Medtronic has requested additional information pertaining to this reportable event.If additional reportable information is received, a supplemental report will be submitted.Select patient information cannot be documented in the file due to regional privacy regulations.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: dislodgement of the valve by the distal tip is related to operator technique or experience.The device instructions for use (ifu), instructs ¿under fluoroscopic guidance, confirm that the catheter tip is coaxial with the inflow portion of the bioprosthesis¿ prior to drawing the delivery catheter system (dcs) tip through the valve.Per the physician, horizontal aorta and anatomical tortuosity contributed to the dislodgement.Dislodgement events do not typically indicate a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications.Difficulties advancing the dcs through the access vessel is known to be related to factors such as patient anatomy and physician technique, including guidewire and introducer sheath selection.In this case, the advancement difficulties were most likely due to interaction with the first valve.Advancement difficulties do not typically indicate a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications.It was noted that the rupture occurred during insertion.Insertion was difficult.Difficulties inserting the dcs through the access vessel is known to be related to factors such as patient anatomy and physician technique, including guidewire and introducer sheath selection.In this case, it was stated that the cause of the aortic abdominal damage was due to tortuous anatomy and wire and the dcs was a contributing factor to the aortic damage.Vascular complications, such as bleeding, are known potential adverse patient effects per the device ifu.A variety of factors can contribute to the onset of asystole.In this case, it was noted the asystole was caused due to the abdominal rupture.A medical safety assessment was performed and based on the available information, the valve dislodgement was caused by the nosecone of the first dcs with tortuosity and aortic angulation contributing.The reported aortic rupture caused the hemorrhaging, asystole, and death.The aortic rupture was likely caused by anatomical tortuosity as well as difficulty advancing the dcs.All reported adverse events and severities are documented within the risk files and instructions for use.There is no information to suggest a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications.Updated: h6 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section d information references the main component of the system.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: d-evolutfx-2329, serial/lot: (b)(6) use by date: 2025.02.13, udi: (b)(4).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received which reported that the abdominal aortic damage was classified as a rupture.It was noted that the rupture occurred during insertion.Insertion was difficult.According to the physician, the "deviation of the tortuous part" was the cause of the rupture.The patient had tortuous blood vessels and a horizontal aorta.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the device was discarded; therefore, no product analysis can be performed.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.Updated data: b5.G2.H6.Patient code corrected data: h6.Eval code method additional codes: annex g medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that prior to the valve implant via right transfemoral access, a pre-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed.Following the bav, using the cuspal overlap technique, slow deployment of the valve was observed.It was noted the delivery catheter system (dcs) was not twisted or torqued at any point during deployment.Subsequently, the valve was implanted in the native annulus.During the procedure, a non-medtronic guidewire was used.When withdrawing the dcs from the patient, the nose cone was centered within the frame inflow by slightly retracting the guidewire.However, interference of the nose cone caused dislodgement of the valve.Per the physician, horizontal aorta and anatomical tortuosity contributed to the dislodgement.Per the physician, the rupture caused and contributed to the patient¿s death.The cause of death was abdominal rupture.It was noted the asystole was caused due to the abdominal rupture.In addition, the cause of the aortic abdominal damage was due to tortuous anatomy and wire and the dcs was a contributing factor to the aortic damage.Percutaneous cardiopulmonary support was provided for the asystole.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT FX DCS
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key16993409
MDR Text Key315852207
Report Number2025587-2023-02182
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/24/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberD-EVOLUTFX-2329
Device Catalogue NumberD-EVOLUTFX-2329
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/20/2023
Date Device Manufactured03/15/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Death;
-
-