MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL BASEPLATE-LM/RL-SZ 4; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 180604 |
Device Problems
Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Osseointegration Problem (3003)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
|
Event Date 05/01/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
Revision from medial uni to total knee replacement.The tibial implant was loose with minimal bonding to the cement mantle.Femur was well fixated.Patient presented with medial knee pain.Left knee.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reported event: an event regarding loosening involving a mako baseplate was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: the implant record, operative report and x-ray ap x-ray confirm that uni-compartmental medial pka was performed.The x-ray shows the uni-compartmental implants to be in anatomic position with pristine interfaces.The second operative report confirms a conversion of this pka to tka was performed as well.No documentation was provided to explain the root cause for the need of this revision.Should additional information become available i would be happy to further this assessment.-product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to loosening of the tibial component.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated "the implant record, operative report and x-ray ap x-ray confirm that uni-compartmental medial pka was performed.The x-ray shows the uni-compartmental implants to be in anatomic position with pristine interfaces.The second operative report confirms a conversion of this pka to tka was performed as well.No documentation was provided to explain the root cause for the need of this revision.Should additional information become available i would be happy to further this assessment." the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
|
Event Description
|
Revision from medial uni to total knee replacement.The tibial implant was loose with minimal bonding to the cement mantle.Femur was well fixated.Patient presented with medial knee pain.Left knee.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|