• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK-NV-CONCERTO
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Myocardial Infarction (1969)
Event Date 02/27/2023
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
Zacà s, patruno i, pulli r, angiletta d.Endovascular repair using parallel grafts to treat a suprarenal pancreatitis-related abdominal aortic pseudoaneurysm.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: official journal of the society for cardiac angiography <(>&<)> interventions.2023;101(5):888-891.Doi:10.1002/ccd.30624.Medtronic literature review found a report of patient complications in association with a concerto coil.The purpose of this article was to describe a contained rupture of a suprarenal abdominal aortic pseudoaneurysm.An aorto-uni-iliac stent-graft was adopted as the aortic main body and was combined with two chimneys and two periscope stents for celiac/superior mesenteric artery and renal arteries, respectively.The procedure was complicated by the entrapment of the celiac sheath into the barbs of the aortic stent-graft and the attempts to remove the sheath resulted in an upward migration of the stent-grafts.A bail-out endovascular procedure was used to reline the stent-grafts and the pseudoaneurysmal sac was embolized with concerto coils.The article does not state any technical issues during use of the concerto coil.The following intra- or post-procedural outcomes were noted:  - the patient died 10 months after the intervention as a result of myocardial infarction.The postoperative period was uneventful.At 6 months follow-up the patient was healthy, and the ct scan confirmed the exclusion of the aortic lesion and the patency of all the stent-grafts.No endoleak/ gutters were observed, and the asymptomatic occlusion of the celiac artery stent was confirmed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Zacà s, patruno i, pulli r, angiletta d.Endovascular repair using parallel grafts to treat a suprarenal pancreatitis-related abdominal aortic pseudoaneurysm.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: official journal of the society for cardiac angiography <(>&<)> interventions.2023;101(5):888-891.Doi:10.1002/ccd.30624 e1.Street 1 (cont.): bari- italy piazza giulio cesare 11.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that the adverse event was related to the medtronic product but it was related to the surgeon's maneuver to obtain the disengagement of the sheath through the barbs of the top bare metal stent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONCERTO
Type of Device
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key17025035
MDR Text Key316192062
Report Number2029214-2023-00865
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/30/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK-NV-CONCERTO
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-NV-CONCERTO
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/03/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age74 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-