• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG EDORA 8 DR; PACEMAKER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG EDORA 8 DR; PACEMAKER Back to Search Results
Model Number 407152
Device Problems Pacing Intermittently (1443); Ambient Noise Problem (2877)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/29/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
This device was explanted due to persistent noise on both channels and inhibited pacing.Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The pacemaker and the right ventricular lead were received for analysis.The right atrial lead was not returned.Prior to the analysis of the returned devices, the quality documents accompanying the manufacturing processes for the pacemaker and the leads were re-investigated.All production steps were performed accordingly.In particular, the final acceptance tests proved the devices functions to be as specified.Upon receipt, the returned lead solia s 60 was subjected to an extensive analysis.The performance of the lead was scrutinized, including a visual, mechanical, electrical and x-ray inspection.The returned lead proved to be without fault throughout its inspection.In particular, the values of the parameters measured during the electrical and mechanical analysis were within the technical specifications.The provided x-ray image was analyzed.An interaction between both leads in the implanted state cannot be excluded.The pacemaker was interrogated using a programmer device.The interrogation was properly feasible, however, noise was present in the right atrial and right ventricular channels, as mentioned in the complaint and observed on the returned data.The pacemaker was subjected to an electrical analysis.The ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.The impedance measurement functions were also normal.A sensing test was performed, which did not provide the expected results.Therefore, the pacemaker was opened and subjected to a thorough destructive analysis.The visual inspection of the inner assembly showed no anomalies.The battery was fully charged.Subsequent thorough investigations revealed a damaged integrated circuit on the electronic module, which led to the clinical observation.In summary, inspection of the returned lead showed no anomalies.The clinical observation resulted from a damaged integrated circuit on the electronic module of the pacemaker.The manufacturing records document a flawless device production.It is therefore assumed that the damage occurred after the device shipment, however, the date of occurrence was not determinable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDORA 8 DR
Type of Device
PACEMAKER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin 12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key17067156
MDR Text Key316701285
Report Number1028232-2023-02780
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NVZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P950037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/11/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/05/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/29/2024
Device Model Number407152
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/11/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/24/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-