• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH RESTORATION ADM X3 INS 28/54; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL / POLYMER, NON-POROUS, CALC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH RESTORATION ADM X3 INS 28/54; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL / POLYMER, NON-POROUS, CALC Back to Search Results
Model Number 7236-2-854
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem Joint Dislocation (2374)
Event Date 05/17/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding disassociation involving an adm liner was reported.The event was confirmed via clinician review of the provided medical records.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "this case concerns a 73-year-old male who underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty and then required revision surgery slightly over two months afterwards.This was performed for dislocation but no other information is provided.I can confirm that the patient underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty and also sustained a dislocation.[¿] the causes of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty are multifactorial.They include surgical technique factors, patient factors including the ability to follow postoperative instructions, activity level and bmi as well as possible implant factors.The root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty.The explanted prosthesis should be submitted to stryker engineers for evaluation and examination to determine if any defects were present.In my opinion that would be highly unlikely.I believe this location in the early postoperative period is usually related to surgical technique factors with failure to restore proper soft tissue tension in the thigh with possible impingement.Other factors could include abductor mechanism insufficiency and soft tissue imbalance." product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to disassociation of the ceramic head from the adm liner.A review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated the following: "this case concerns a 73-year-old male who underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty and then required revision surgery slightly over two months afterwards.This was performed for dislocation but no other information is provided.I can confirm that the patient underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty and also sustained a dislocation.[¿] the causes of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty are multifactorial.They include surgical technique factors, patient factors including the ability to follow postoperative instructions, activity level and bmi as well as possible implant factors.The root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty.The explanted prosthesis should be submitted to stryker engineers for evaluation and examination to determine if any defects were present.In my opinion that would be highly unlikely.I believe this location in the early postoperative period is usually related to surgical technique factors with failure to restore proper soft tissue tension in the thigh with possible impingement.Other factors could include abductor mechanism insufficiency and soft tissue imbalance." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.H3 other text : not available.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient's right hip was revised.As reported: "was noticed on film and interop that the poly head had disassociated from the inner ceramic bearing.No other information available due to hospital policy.New mdm head construct reimplanted.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESTORATION ADM X3 INS 28/54
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL / POLYMER, NON-POROUS, CALC
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
marisol santiago
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key17076197
MDR Text Key316676559
Report Number0002249697-2023-00636
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MEH
UDI-Device Identifier07613327315820
UDI-Public07613327315820
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K182468
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/06/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number7236-2-854
Device Catalogue Number7236-2-854
Device Lot Number94518201
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/02/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-