• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ACTIVA; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (M

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ACTIVA; IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (M Back to Search Results
Model Number 37612
Device Problems Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Failure to Interrogate (1332); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Battery Problem (2885); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 02/16/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient's dbs implant didn't have good programming since "just before covid," so the patient had turned the therapy off a couple of years ago because when therapy was on, the patient had bad side effects.Today the patient rep tried to charge the patient and couldn't because the recharger wouldn't communicate with the implant (repositioning the antenna screen was coming up during the call, but no damage was seen to the recharger antenna cord).The patient programmer pp was giving poor communication.The pt rep said it had been "3-4 weeks" since the patient had charged their implant, and even though the patient doesn't use the therapy, they do charge their implant every couple of months.Pss reviewed info about possible overdischarge and redirected pt to hcp.Additional information was received later from the manufacturer representative (rep) that the patient's ins had not been charged in several years and may be overdischarged.The caller indicated that when they attempted to charge the ins, they got an equals sign message or some weird symbol.The caller asked about the process of charging the ins.Tss reviewed the information and sent the clinician programmer manual to the caller.Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep) on 2023-jun-13 reported that the patient decided to turn the therapy off to resolve the bad side effects symptoms.The ins overdischarged issue was still unresolved at the time of the call.They are trying to make an appointment with a new movement neurologist to get it taken care of.The information was confirmed with the account.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the manufacturer¿s representative (rep) reported there didn¿t seem to be any issues with the recharging system or patient programmer.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the manufacturer¿s representative (rep) reported they met with the patient to start a physician mode recharge (pmr) as the device was in over-discharge and wouldn¿t connect with the tablet or the recharger.The rep cleared the power on reset (por) and reminded the patient to recharge the implant.The rep then mentioned the patient¿s cord on their recharger was exposed so they wanted to get them a wireless recharger.It was noted the patient had stopped using therapy over the pandemic because the system wasn¿t providing relief, but they stated they had been charging every 2-4 weeks, so they didn¿t know how the device got into over-discharge.Following the por being cleared the patient was able to charge the implant and connect and were instructed to charge daily.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVA
Type of Device
IMPLANTED SUBCORTICAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATOR (M
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key17122570
MDR Text Key317833478
Report Number3004209178-2023-10814
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRU
UDI-Device Identifier00643169529762
UDI-Public00643169529762
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H020007
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/04/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/13/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/14/2016
Device Model Number37612
Device Catalogue Number37612
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/01/2023
Date Device Manufactured07/16/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age28 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-