It was reported that one day post procedure for left posterior communicating artery with the subject flow diverter, the patient had aphasia adjudicated as a minor stroke ischemic ipsilateral.Mri revealed multiple signs of recent ischemic stroke in the frontal and left parieto-occipital region, in connection with thromboembolic accidents per procedure.There was no device deficiency reported.The study device was implanted successfully, completely covering the neck in conjunction with a previously implanted device (coiling was performed in (b)(6) 2022).According to site this adverse event is not related to the subject flow diverter but according to cec members it had a causal relationship with the procedure and a possible relationship with the subject flow diverting stent and dapt (dual anti-platelet therapy).The adverse event was resolved without any treatment.No additional information available.
|
It was reported that one day post procedure for left posterior communicating artery with the subject flow diverter, the patient had aphasia adjudicated as a minor stroke ischemic ipsilateral.Mri revealed multiple signs of recent ischemic stroke in the frontal and left parieto-occipital region, in connection with thromboembolic accidents per procedure.There was no device deficiency reported.The study device was implanted successfully, completely covering the neck in conjunction with a previously implanted device (coiling was performed in (b)(6) 2022).According to site this adverse event is not related to the subject flow diverter but according to cec members it had a causal relationship with the procedure and a possible relationship with the subject flow diverting stent and dapt (dual anti-platelet therapy).The adverse event was resolved without any treatment.No additional information available.
|
H4 manufacturing date ¿ added, d4 expiration date - added, d4 lot # - corrected from 22312218 to 22312218r.Due to the automated mes (manufacturing execution system) system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.The subject device was not available; therefore, a visual inspection as well as a functional evaluation could not be performed.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported complaint could not be confirmed, and it could not be definitively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.Additional information provided by the customer indicated there was no medical intervention.The surgery start time: 8:04; end time: 11h16.The patient¿s mrs score=0.There was no device deficiency reported.The study device was implanted successfully, completely covering the neck in conjunction with a previously implanted device (coiling was performed in (b)(6) 2022).The site reported the adverse event as not related to the study device but the cec (clinical events committee) members considered the adverse event was possibly related to the study device.An assignable cause of anticipated procedural complication will be assigned to the reported event as a product related root cause does not apply and the issue is due to a known physiological effect of the procedure and/or patient condition noted with the directions for use, product labeling and/or risk documentation files.
|