|
Model Number 35615 |
Device Problem
Defective Device (2588)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/24/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the markerband moved from the original position.An accustick ii was selected for use.During preparation, it was noted that the device ro marker was not in the original position.The procedure was completed with a different device.There were no patient complications.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the markerband moved from the original position.An accustick ii was selected for use.During preparation, it was noted that the device ro marker was not in the original position.The procedure was completed with a different device.There were no patient complications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Media analysis: the complaint device was not returned by the customer; nevertheless, physician has provided two photos of two device.As per pictures provided, it can be observed that the ro marker was out of its location in the device distal section and the accustick device was observed bent.No more damages were observed.Updated fields: evaluation method codes, evaluation result codes, evaluation result codes.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Media analysis: the complaint device was not returned by the customer; nevertheless, physician has provided two photos of two device.As per pictures provided, it can be observed that the ro marker was out of its location in the device distal section and the accustick device was observed bent.No more damages were observed.Updated fields: evaluation method codes, evaluation result codes, evaluation result codes device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The accustick device was returned with the dilator and the canula.It was observed that the ro marker was out of its location in the device distal section since it moves freely.Additionally, the accustick device was bent and had the distal tip was broken.The canula was observed bent.The pouch was returned, and it was observed that the pouch information matches with the complaint information.The device was inspected under microscope, and it was observed that the distal tip was broken, this damage is located next to the ro marker position.It's important to mention that evidence of correct ro marker colocation was observed at device distal end section.The device was measured in order to confirm the ro marker position; and the ro marker was located approximately at 7,1 cm from the distal tip.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the markerband moved from the original position.An accustick ii was selected for use.During preparation, it was noted that the device ro marker was not in the original position.The procedure was completed with a different device.There were no patient complications.The complaint device was not returned by the customer; nevertheless, physician has provided two photos of two device.As per pictures provided, it can be observed that the ro marker was out of its location in the device distal section and the accustick device was observed bent.No more damages were observed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|