MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL 5.5MM HEALIX ADVANCE SP PEEK ANCHOR; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, NON-BIOABSORBABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 228056 |
Device Problems
Material Deformation (2976); Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 06/07/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).D4: the expiration date is currently unavailable.H4: the device manufacture date is currently unavailable.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by a healthcare professional in china that during a rotator cuff repair procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the suture was winding and the anchor was pulled out on the 5.5mm healix advance sp peek anchor device.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device was returned and evaluated.Upon visual inspection, it was observed that the device's shaft is in good condition as well as the inserter shaft, no structural anomalies were observed.The suture was found entangled and the threader was twisted.The anchor was in used condition, it does not show structural anomalies as well as the dilator peek.The anchor also, shows foreign material, presumably biological matter.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 9l52756 number, and no non-conformances were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.According with the visual inspection result, this complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the reported condition can be attributed to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; an incorrect alignment of the anchor when it was being inserter may have caused an incomplete insertion and consequently the anchor was pulled out along with the device.As per ifu: ensure that anchor is inserted axially to the bone hole (limit off-axis insertion).Improper instrument use, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion may result in anchor fracture or reduced performance.A possible root cause for the sutures entangled can be attributed to an improper slot orientation.As per healix advance¿ self-punching anchor usage guide; keep slot facing the suture (toward patient¿s head for rotator cuff) to prevent suture entanglement.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.: the date device returned to manufacturer the has been updated to reflect the correct information.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|