• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: IMRIS - DEERFIELD IMAGING, INC. IMRIS IMRI 3T V; MAGNETIC RESONANCE DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

IMRIS - DEERFIELD IMAGING, INC. IMRIS IMRI 3T V; MAGNETIC RESONANCE DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number 120823-000
Device Problems Mechanical Jam (2983); Positioning Problem (3009)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/22/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during a craniotomy with intra-operative imaging planned, the mri magnet would not move due to continuous errors from the device's collision detection system.The errors prevented intended mri movement from the diagnostic room to the imaging position in the operating room, and intra-operative imaging was not possible prior to closure of the skull.Upon completion of the surgery, the surgeon removed the patient from the skull pins, dressed the wound and ordered post-operative mr imaging in the diagnostic room.It was reported that additional anesthesia was administered and approximately 45 minutes of delay was incurred in connection with the system errors.The patient was reported to be doing well after completion of the case and no additional surgical intervention was required based on post-operative imaging.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An imris service engineer was on-site later the same day and identified a break in the pressure sensor array within the collision detection system was causing errors preventing magnet movement.The collision detection system functions to prevent mri movement in the event of a collision and was locking out mri movement as a safeguard; however, no collision had occurred in this event.System function was restored and the manufacturer has initiated internal corrective action to further investigate and address this issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The root cause was traced to device design, specifically to requirements for serviceability and repeatable collision detection without producing a fault condition or error message.The integrated pressure activated collision detection system design was functioning as intended to prevent mri magnet movement where the system exhibits an underlying fault condition.A break in the sensor array produced inadequate electrical continuity and produced a fault condition locking out mri magnet movement.The break likely occurred during standard third-party service.This event was reported due to the length of procedural delay under anesthesia reported by the end user.The procedure was reported to be successful and no patient injury occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMRIS IMRI 3T V
Type of Device
MAGNETIC RESONANCE DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
IMRIS - DEERFIELD IMAGING, INC.
1230 chaska creek way
suite 100
chaska MN 55318
Manufacturer Contact
paul campbell
1230 chaska creek way
suite 100
chaska, MN 55318
7632036344
MDR Report Key17167194
MDR Text Key318111696
Report Number3010326005-2023-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNH
UDI-Device Identifier00857534006745
UDI-Public(01)00857534006745
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K212367
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/20/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number120823-000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/22/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/02/2023
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age16 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight55 KG
-
-