TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION 8F ANGIO-SEAL VIP VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICE, OUS; DEVICE, HEMOSTASIS, VASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/26/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A1: patient identifier: requested, not provided.A2: age & date of birth: requested, not provided.A3: patient sex: requested, not provided.A4: weight: requested, not provided.A5: ethnicity: requested, not provided.A6: race: requested, not provided.D6a: implanted date: device was not implanted.D6b: explanted date: device was not explanted.A review of the device history record of the product code and lot number combination was conducted with no findings.The actual device was not available for returned; therefore, an evaluation of the actual device will not be conducted.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.
|
|
Event Description
|
The user facility reported the involved angio-seal insertion sheath was broken.During preparation of the assembly, a tear was found in the tip of the insertion sheath and was determined unable to be inserted into the artery.The device was not used, and another angio-seal device was used to continue the procedure.Subsequently, hemostasis was successfully achieved by the second device.The procedure before deploying the device was coiling (ic-an).A pre-deployment angiogram was performed.The size of the sheath ancillary used was 8 fr.The puncture site was proximal to the inguinal ligament of the right common femoral artery.The vessel diameter was 2.5 mm.No health damages.The event occurred pre-treatment.The patient was not injured, medical or surgical intervention was not required.There were no other devices or equipment used with the reported product.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being sent as follow-up # 1 to provide the completed investigation results.The actual device was not returned; therefore, an evaluation of the actual device was unable to be conducted.The complaint was unable to be confirmed as the sample was not available for evaluation.An exact root cause for the issue was unable to be determined.The device history record (dhr) review determined that the device was in a conforming state when released from terumo control.There is no indication that any manufacturing, design, or quality system issues may have led to this event.Currently, no action is recommended since this risk evaluation is within the predetermined limits in the failure mode and effects analysis (fmea)/ hazard based risk table (hbrt).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|