• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONMED LARGO POWERPRO ELECTRIC II MODULAR HANDPIECE; ARTHROSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONMED LARGO POWERPRO ELECTRIC II MODULAR HANDPIECE; ARTHROSCOPE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PRO6100
Device Problem Self-Activation or Keying (1557)
Patient Problem Laceration(s) (1946)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The customer reported that the device, pro6100, powerpro electric ii modular handpiece, was being used during an unknown procedure on an unknown date when it was reported, ¿the motor started up without pressing the trigger.As the trigger was fitted with an a0 bit and a drill, the handpiece injured the surgeon.For your information, all ao tips have been tested without any problems.¿.Further assessment questioning was asked, and the reporter stated, ¿the wick got caught in the surgeon's glove and went haywire.The surgeon was cut." there was no report of medical intervention or hospitalization for the user.There was no report of injury, medical intervention, of hospitalization for the user.The procedure was completed as planned.This report is being raised due to the reported injury of the surgeon being cut.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported device is being returned to conmed for evaluation.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the device evaluation and complaint investigation.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.H3 other text : device not yet received.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not overdue for preventative maintenance.No deficiency was noted with the operation of the device; however, the device did have moisture incursion from seal failure.The device was serviced, repaired, and met all specifications.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.The service history was reviewed, and no data was found.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been a total of two complaints, regarding two devices, for this device family and failure mode.During this same time frame 742 devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed for this reported failure, the rate of failure would be 0.003.Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: handle all equipment carefully.If any equipment is dropped or damaged in any way, return it immediately for service.The user is also advised to perform the required preoperative functional tests for the equipment and accessories prior to each use.Additionally, the ifu continues gently shake the equipment free of water and wipe the surfaces with a clean, lint-free towel.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the device, pro6100, powerpro electric ii modular handpiece, was being used during an unknown procedure on an unknown date when it was reported, ¿the motor started up without pressing the trigger.As the trigger was fitted with an a0 bit and a drill, the handpiece injured the surgeon.For your information, all ao tips have been tested without any problems.¿.Further assessment questioning was asked, and the reporter stated, ¿the wick got caught in the surgeon's glove and went haywire.The surgeon was cut.".There was no report of medical intervention or hospitalization for the user.There was no report of injury, medical intervention, of hospitalization for the user.The procedure was completed as planned.This report is being raised due to the reported injury of the surgeon being cut.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information, update 13nov23: the probable cause for the customer's ¿unconfirmed¿ reported ¿handpiece running without trigger activated¿ was probably due to the confirmed moisture intrusion from seal failures leading to ¿intermittent electronic signal failures in the handpiece." the device was not overdue for preventative maintenance.No deficiency was noted with the operation of the device; however, the device did have moisture incursion from seal failure.The device was serviced, repaired, and met all specifications.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.The service history was reviewed, and no data was found.(b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: handle all equipment carefully.If any equipment is dropped or damaged in any way, return it immediately for service.The user is also advised to perform the required preoperative functional tests for the equipment and accessories prior to each use.Additionally, the ifu continues gently shake the equipment free of water and wipe the surfaces with a clean, lint-free towel.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the device, pro6100, powerpro electric ii modular handpiece, was being used during an unknown procedure on an unknown date when it was reported, ¿the motor started up without pressing the trigger.As the trigger was fitted with an a0 bit and a drill, the handpiece injured the surgeon.For your information, all ao tips have been tested without any problems.¿.Further assessment questioning was asked, and the reporter stated, ¿the wick got caught in the surgeon's glove and went haywire.The surgeon was cut.".There was no report of medical intervention or hospitalization for the user.There was no report of injury, medical intervention, of hospitalization for the user.The procedure was completed as planned.This report is being raised due to the reported injury of the surgeon being cut.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPRO ELECTRIC II MODULAR HANDPIECE
Type of Device
ARTHROSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONMED LARGO
11311 concept blvd
largo FL 33773
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONMED LARGO
11311 concept blvd
largo FL 33773
Manufacturer Contact
john berga
11311 concept blvd
largo, FL 33773
7273995358
MDR Report Key17197589
MDR Text Key317814569
Report Number1017294-2023-00057
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K981269
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/26/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberPRO6100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/02/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-