The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other complaints from the lot.All available information was investigated, and the reported failure to difficult to advance the sgc appears to be related to patient conditions (tortuous iliac vein).Additionally, based on the information reviewed, the reported perforation of vessels is related to procedural conditions associated with difficulty advancing the sgc.Vessel perforation is listed in the instructions for use (ifu) as a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.Surgical intervention was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
This is filed to report perforation.It was reported this was a mitraclip procedure to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4 and a tortuous iliac vein.A steerable guide catheter (sgc) was inserted into the iliac vein, resistance was noted while advancing and a pop was heard.The pop was suspected to be a perforation of the vein.The procedure was continued, and two clips were successfully implanted.When the sgc was removed, a small hole in the iliac vein was observed and the hole was repaired by a vascular surgeon.Mr was reduced to a grade of 1.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|