|
Catalog Number SGC0702 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Insert (1316); Product Quality Problem (1506)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 06/08/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
This is filed to report intervention.It was reported that a patient presented with grade 4 functional mitral regurgitation.During a mitraclip procedure, it was noted that the transition between the soft tip of the steerable guide catheter (sgc) and the dilator was more prominent than usual.Inserting the sgc was noted to be difficult.The femoral vein was dilated with a 22 and 24 french dilator, and the sgc was able to be inserted.After a successful procedure, it was noted that one of the standard sutures close to the puncture site was damaged by the prominent edge of the sgc.This required additional suturing with 2 proglide devices.There was a delay of 20 minutes due to the difficulty, but it was not clinically significant.There were no adverse patient effects.One mitraclip, reduced the mr to grade 1-2.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
All available information was investigated, and the reported difficult to insert (anatomy) could not be replicated in a testing environment.The reported product quality problem (irregular appearance) was not confirmed via device analysis.Additionally, the soft tip was observed to have minor deformation.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints reported from this lot.Based on available information, the observed deformation due to compressive stress associated with the minor soft tip deformation appears to be due to the insertion difficulty.The cause of the reported product quality problem (irregular appearance) associated with the prominent transition between the soft tip and dilator, and the reported difficult to insert (anatomy), could not be determined.The reported unexpected medical intervention was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|