It was reported that, after a thr surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2022, the patient experienced breakage of the polarstem stem std ti/ha 1 non-cem.This adverse event was treated by a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, in which the polarstem stem std ti / ha 1 non-cem was exchanged.Patient's current health status is in a good general condition.
|
Section h10: it was reported that, after a revision total hip replacement surgery, the patient experienced breakage of the polarstem stem std ti/ha 1 non-cem.This adverse event was treated by a revision surgery in which a polarstem stem std ti/ha 1 non-cem was exchanged.Patient's current health status is in a good general condition.The complaint device used in treatment was returned for investigation.A visual evaluation of the device was conducted, and it was concluded that the stem is fractured on the distal side.The area around the proximal thread appears to be fine but heavy scratches can be seen around the fracture area.It is suspected, that the scratches arose while removing the implant from the body.An assessment of the material properties was conducted and it was concluded that about three quarter of the fracture surface show fatigue striations, indicating that the crack propagated by fatigue.Crack initiation was found to be at the lateral side of the fractured stem in the distal region.The residual fracture surface showed characteristic of ductile overload.No pores or inclusions, which could have initiated or enhanced crack growth, could be observed on the fracture surface.In the area of assumed crack initiation, no scratches have been found but could be hidden under the coating.A review of the production documentation did not detect any deviation that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.The review of historical complaints for the alleged device revealed no additional similar complaints reported for the same batch, and no additional similar complaints for the same product number over the past 12 months with similar failure mode.A review of past corrective actions was performed.No further escalation is required.A review of the risk management documentation verifies the failure mode, occurrence and severity of the reported issue.The instructions for use states "implant component fracture" as a ¿potential medical device problems¿, and "overweight patient, obesity" is also indicated as a "risk factor" which can influence the success of the operation resulting from a hip arthroplasty.With the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the pain and loosening polar shaft cannot be definitively concluded; however, the patients¿ very severe obesity cannot be ruled out as a possible contributing factor to her pain and clinical status.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.There is no indication that the reported device failed to meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The root cause of the reported event remains undetermined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged event are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight and trauma to the joint replacement.The need for further actions is not indicated.Nevertheless, smith+nephew will continue to monitor this device for similar issues.The returned device will be retained.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
|