• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN MFG DC BOULDER SONICISION; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN MFG DC BOULDER SONICISION; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number SCDA39
Device Problems Failure to Cut (2587); Failure to Fire (2610); Difficult to Open or Close (2921); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/19/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
According to the reporter, during procedure, the device stopped working.Also had insufficient cutting and while operating jaws were not opening and it was closed.Dissector prongs bent or missing.No batteries were installed onto the handpiece.There were no error tones heard or red lights observed.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the dissector had a cracked waveguide and had been used.Functionally, the assembled device returned a green light and produced a welcome tone.It immediately alarmed when activated.The waveguide was inspected under magnification and the origin of the crack was identified.Investigation personnel concluded that the titanium waveguide became cracked from continued use after it may have come in contact with a metallic object.Used after damage can cause the cracked waveguide to break off.Manufacturing does 100% inspection during the assembly and packaging processes.The defect sample would have been rejected if found prior to shipping, had it been an assembly defect.Manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and no non-conformance's were found that could have contributed to the failure.No defects or damage were observed in the packaging returned that could have contributed to the reported defect.It was reported that the jaws of the device were difficult to open and the dissector prongs on the device were bent.The reported issues could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.It was also reported that the device had a cutting issue and received a red light and would not activate during use.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: contact between the active blade and other metal objects (hemostats, clips, staples, retractors, etc.) may result in product damage, such as a broken blade.Pieces of a broken blade may fall into the surgical cavity causing unintended tissue damage.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SONICISION
Type of Device
INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN MFG DC BOULDER
5920 longbow dr
boulder CO 80301 3299
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN MFG DC BOULDER
5920 longbow dr
boulder CO 80301 3299
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key17259139
MDR Text Key319184815
Report Number1717344-2023-00810
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LFL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K180149
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/05/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSCDA39
Device Catalogue NumberSCDA39
Device Lot Number22710247X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-