|
Model Number LXMC17 |
Device Problems
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Hernia (2240); Abdominal Distention (2601)
|
Event Date 06/21/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 7/5/2023 attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? on what date did the implant take place? what is the lot number of the linx device? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the lap hiatal hernia repair with linx removal the device was ineffective and causing bulging from consumption of food.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Investigation summary: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, tooling marks were observed in some bead cases and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 7/21/2023.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? on what date did the implant take place? what is the lot number of the linx device? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? answer : -the patient was vetted properly and met requirements for linx placement.- the surgeon used pop + 3 sizing.- the patient received hiatal hernia repair.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|