• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MONTERIS MEDICAL 3.3MM MINI-BOLT VUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MONTERIS MEDICAL 3.3MM MINI-BOLT VUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 21133
Device Problem Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 06/07/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
During an ablation procedure, it was reported that a 3.3mm vue mini-bolt was used.When anchoring the vue bolt, the user did a total of 5.5 turns after start of purchase.For vue bolt removal, the user used the blue hex adapter.The blue adapter could not grip and would only spin on top of the vue bolt.Instead, the user tried to use the vue bolt removal end of the removal tool after given specific instructions to prevent torque to the bolt.The removal tool was turned once, then an audible noise was heard on the second turn.The tool was removed from the bolt and the ceramic shards were visible.The bolt was anchored in the left frontal region above the hairline.The vue bolt was placed close to perpendicular to the skull with no more than a 10 degree angle.The user was standing on the right side of the patient facing superiorly reaching across to the left side from above the patient when using the vue end of the tool to remove the vue bolt.The clinical specialist confirmed that the user first attempted to use hemostats around the vue bolt to remove it from the skull, however, it kept slipping.The user then used a small drill to make a few holes around the base of the bolt around one side.Then a curette was used to remove remaining bone.The user was then able to easily remove the vue bolt from the bone without further damage to the bolt.The vue bolt, broken ceramic shards, and hex adapter was sent back to the office for investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The vue bolt, fragmented pieces of the bolt, and the hex adapter was returned, and the bolt was observed to be broken on the crown.An investigation was done to investigate potential failure modes of the vue mini-bolt removal.Testing results of the investigation showed that without the application of side loading, the samples were able to withstand higher force during removal.Investigation determined that when the removal tool is not properly seated or aligned on the vue mini-bolt, the multi-bending forces and stress concentricity can cause the bolt-crown to break.There are no additional patient comorbidities reported for this case.
 
Event Description
During an ablation procedure, it was reported that a 3.3mm vue mini-bolt was used.When anchoring the vue bolt, the user did a total of 5.5 turns after start of purchase.For vue bolt removal, the user used the blue hex adapter.The blue adapter could not grip and would only spin on top of the vue bolt.Instead, the user tried to use the vue bolt removal end of the removal tool after given instructions by monteris clinical specialist to prevent torque to the bolt with the metal end of the tool.The removal tool was turned once, then a noise was heard on the second turn.The tool was removed from the bolt and the ceramic shards were visible.The bolt was anchored in the left frontal region above the hairline.The vue bolt was placed close to perpendicular to the skull with no more than a 10 degree angle.The user was standing on the right side of the patient facing superiorly reaching across to the left side from above the patient when using the vue end of the tool to remove the vue bolt.The user first attempted to use hemostats around the vue bolt to remove it from the skull, however, it kept slipping.The user then used a small drill to make a few holes around the base of the bolt around one side.Then a curette was used to remove remaining bone.The user was then able to easily remove the vue bolt from the bone without further damage to the bolt.The vue bolt, broken ceramic shards, and hex adapter was sent back to the office for investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The vue bolt, fragmented pieces of the bolt, and the hex adapter was returned, and the bolt was observed to be broken on the crown.An investigation was done to investigate potential failure modes of the vue mini-bolt removal.Testing results of the investigation showed that without the application of side loading, the samples were able to withstand higher force during removal.Investigation determined that when the removal tool is not properly seated or aligned on the vue mini-bolt, the multi-bending forces and stress concentricity can cause the bolt-crown to break.Additional information from the physician was received on 6-jul-2023, confirming that there were no patient complications reported for this case, and the patient was discharged according to plan.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.3MM MINI-BOLT VUE
Type of Device
3.3MM MINI-BOLT VUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MONTERIS MEDICAL
131 cheshire ln
suite 100
minnetonka MN 55305
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer englund
131 cheshire ln
suite 100
minnetonka, MN 55305
MDR Report Key17261817
MDR Text Key318446166
Report Number3009970070-2023-00020
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HAO
UDI-Device Identifier00816589021233
UDI-Public00816589021233
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
N/A
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/05/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number21133
Device Catalogue NumberCMB033-V
Device Lot Number8379601
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/13/2023
Date Manufacturer Received06/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/29/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-