Qn # (b)(4).The sample was returned by the customer and sent to the manufacturing site for investigation.The manufacturing site reports "during the visual inspection it can be observed the carton tube show signs of contamination and damage.Also, the bougie have contamination through the body." a device history record review was performed on the lot number of the returned sample and no relevant findings were identified.The manufacturing site conclusion: "per visual inspection results, the condition reported as "spots on the product" cannot be confirmed due the condition in which the material was received.In additional according to the revision of the dhr (device history record) no discrepancies were found on the manufacturing of this product, no tools are used in the manufacturing and inspection process that can generate or be related with the condition reported.The following activities took place: manufacturing personnel were notified of this event on july 25th, 2023." other remarks: n/a corrected data: n/a.
|