Additional information: h3 - evaluation.H4 - production date.H6 - codes updated.Investigation: an unbroken ceramic femoral head and a metal cup were submitted.They have been forwarded to the manufacturer of the ceramic components (ceramtec gmbh, plochingen), where they were examined.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records (dhr) have been checked for all leading device(s) lot numbers and the products found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.There are 0 similar complaints against the same lot number the current failure rate is within the risk analysis and therefore acceptable according to din en iso 14971; severity was 4(5) and probability 1(5).Explanation and rationale: the microstructure obtained from quality documents of both components meets requirements specificed at the time of production.There is no indication of any pre-existing material defect.Due to the fact that the insert was not provided for analysis, no conclusion can be drawn regarding a possible cause for the fracture of the insert.Both components showed abrasion which indicated intensive contact between parts after the primary fracture event.Conclusion and preventive measures: based upon the investigation results, a clear root cause cannot be determined.The femoral head does not provide any indication regarding a possible cause for the failure, and neither does the metal cup.Based upon the investigation results, a capa is not necessary.
|