• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION JETSTREAM XC; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION JETSTREAM XC; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 45007
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/21/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the device became entrapped on the guidewire.A 2.1mm jetstream xc atherectomy catheter was selected for a left leg angiogram to treat claudication.During the second pass, however, the device blades stopped spinning.The pump was still running and it sounded like the motor was trying to work, but nothing happened.No error message was observed.The physician attempted to restart the device, but it was entrapped on the wire and would not budge.The entire system, wire and catheter, had to be removed.They were able to be separated once removed from the body.A different device was used to complete the procedure, and there were no complications reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation by manufacturer: the product was returned to boston scientific for analysis.Returned product consisted of a jetstream xc-2.1 atherectomy device.The device and the catheter shaft were analyzed for damage.The returned device showed buckling/kinks located 1cm and 4cm from the tip.The device was connected to the jetstream console per the instructions for use (ifu) and was functionally tested for any issues or errors.A test.014 thruway guidewire was inserted into the tip of the catheter and the wire transcended through the device with no hesitations or restrictions.The device primed as designed.The guidewire was inserted into the gard.The device did not function as designed.The motor was heard; however, no tip rotation was noticed.The devices pod was opened to inspect for damage.It was noticed the pinion gear had slipped off the drive shaft.When the pinion gear slides off the shaft and does not contact the motor gear, rotation of the blades would stop.The gear was slid back on the shaft and the device was run again.The gear again slid off the shaft.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage showed no other damage or irregularities.Device analysis determined the condition of the returned device was consistent with the reported information.The complaint for blades not spinning was confirmed as well as shaft damage.The guidewire sticking was not confirmed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JETSTREAM XC
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key17321637
MDR Text Key319234355
Report Number2124215-2023-36310
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
UDI-Device Identifier08714729889892
UDI-Public08714729889892
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K133023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/13/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/13/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number45007
Device Catalogue Number45007
Device Lot Number0030858753
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/30/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/21/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-