• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US FMS FLUID MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INFLOW TUBING (FMS VUE); ARTHROSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US FMS FLUID MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INFLOW TUBING (FMS VUE); ARTHROSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number 284508
Device Problems Leak/Splash (1354); Delivered as Unsterile Product (1421); Overfill (2404)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/04/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).H4: the device manufacture date is currently unavailable.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the field service engineer in switzerland that during a rotator cuff repair procedure on (b)(6) 2023, an fms fluid management system inflow tubing (fms vue) device was used.According to the report, about 15min into the surgery, the surgeon realized that the inflow chamber kept refilling and that water was dripping out of the tube on top of the chamber.It was further reported that they noticed that the tubes were not sealed properly.It was reported that the surgeon changed all inflow and outflow tubes and gave the patient antibiotics.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Visual observations revealed that the complaint device was received in used condition, one of the tubes was cut.The tubbing was easily detached from the chamber.A functional tests could not be performed due to the device tube condition.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 3005216, and no nonconformances were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A previous investigation was performed by the manufacturer with the following result: the operator responsible for the tube bonding was properly trained to the operation.However, a non-uniform solvent application may result in an insufficient bond.The documented work instructions (284508-wi, operation 2a) are clear in regards to the bonding operation, material and equipment used.There were no inputs from this category that would potentially cause this type of defect.In conclusion, a potential root cause for this defect may be attributed to an incorrect bonding method.If the tube is not placed into the solvent dispenser in an upright, straight position, there may be a lack of solvent applied to the tube causing an insufficient bond.Corrective action: a new solvent dispenser (tl-0267-001) will be implemented so that the operators are only able to dip the tube in a straight position, preventing inadequate solvent application.This fixture will be qualified as part of qv-07307.Once the validation is complete, work instructions will be updated as part of ppcr #23-0315 with customer approval.In addition, a quality alert was issued to the production floor and operators were re-trained on proper solvent application and tube bonding.This product issue is already being addressed by depuy quality system.Depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: a photo returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.The depuy synthes mitek team conducted a visual inspection of the returned photo.Upon visual inspection of the photo, it appeared to be disconnected from the expansion chamber, but it is not possible to confirm this condition in this part of the device, it is necessary to physical evaluate.There are no further images that can help in the determination of a root cause.The photo does not provide enough evidence to confirm the failure reported.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.According with the visual inspection of the photo, and considering that the device was not tested, this complaint cannot be confirmed.The device is required for testing, the photo provided does not contain enough evidence to determine why the customer experienced the failure, hands on analysis should provide the required evidence to provide a root cause.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FMS FLUID MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INFLOW TUBING (FMS VUE)
Type of Device
ARTHROSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key17326637
MDR Text Key319378352
Report Number1221934-2023-02758
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRX
UDI-Device Identifier10886705023066
UDI-Public10886705023066
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K951843
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Consumer,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/14/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number284508
Device Catalogue Number284508
Device Lot Number3005216
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-