H10: manufacturer narrative: h3, h6: the investigation was performed based on expert discussions considering complaint description, customer service reports, system history, and system log files.According to provided information, no stand movement was possible during an emergency procedure.The procedure was then continued and finished using an alternative system.No health consequences were reported to this event.The investigation of the log files revealed that the failure was already present with system startup.No connection could be established between the robot and ccom (central computing).As a result, system movement functionality was blocked.System restarts performed by the customer could not fix the problem.As part of reactive service activity, individual components (ccom, iob - input output box and robot) were restarted.The subsequent system check did not reveal any system problem.Unfortunately, both the on-site service intervention and the detailed investigation of the log files did not provide a clear picture of how this error occurred.The error mentioned in the complaint has not again been reported since then.The occurrence rate of the aforementioned error pattern was checked.A possible error accumulation or even a systematic error, which leads to a corrective action of the installed base, could not be determined by the investigation.H11: corrected data: g2: report source health professional should have been checked on the initial report submitted to the fda on july 17, 2023.H11: corrected data: g2: report source health professional should have been checked on the initial report submitted to the fda on july 17, 2023.
|