• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA APOLLO; ANESTHESIA UNITS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA APOLLO; ANESTHESIA UNITS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8606500
Device Problems Gas Output Problem (1266); Failure to Deliver (2338); Protective Measures Problem (3015)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/23/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during use of automatic ventilation, when connecting the inoflo connector to the inspiratory side, the device alarmed for "ventilator fail" and switched to manual ventilation.Switching back to automatic ventilation was, as further reported, not possible.There was no patient consequences reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation has just started; results will be provided in a follow-up report.H3 other text : on-going.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The electronic device logfile was provided for investigation.Unfortunately, the user section of the logfile was already overwritten for the given date (2023-06-23).Thus, the case in question could not be reconstructed in detail.According to the device log records, it could be confirmed that on the date of event, the ventilator performed an emergency shutdown due to a detected overpressure at the patient end of the circuit leading to a pressure peak.Most likely, the overpressure situation was caused by the surgical therapy, but also a patient coughing against the ventilator could explain the pressure peak.A connection between the usage of the inoflo system in combination with the apollo and the reported symptom could neither be confirmed nor excluded on the basis of the available information.To prevent from damages, the system is designed to shut down automatic ventilation and to alert the user to this condition by means of a corresponding alarm.Manual ventilation and the monitoring functions remain available to the full extent.Dräger finally concludes that the device responded as specified upon the detected situation with an autonomous shutdown while changing mode to man/spont (safety mode) accompanied by an audible and visible "ventilator fail" alarm.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during use of automatic ventilation, when connecting the inoflo connector to the inspiratory side, the device alarmed for "ventilator fail" and switched to manual ventilation.Switching back to automatic ventilation was, as further reported, not possible.There was no patient consequences reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APOLLO
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA UNITS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM   23542
Manufacturer Contact
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
4518822868
MDR Report Key17348827
MDR Text Key319419789
Report Number9611500-2023-00263
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K042607
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/21/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/19/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Catalogue Number8606500
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/30/2009
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-