• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OKAMI MEDICAL INC. LOBO VASCULAR OCCLUDER; VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OKAMI MEDICAL INC. LOBO VASCULAR OCCLUDER; VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number LOBO-7
Device Problem Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Necrosis (1971); Pain (1994); Pulmonary Edema (2020); Inadequate Pain Relief (2388); Hypervolemia (2664); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 06/22/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The lobo-7 device remains implanted in the patient, remains stable, and is not available for evaluation.The device identifiers were provided and the lot history records were reviewed; there were no deviations or nonconformances relevant to the reportable event.Intraoperative images were sent to the manufacturer for evaluation and the investigation is underway.The findings will be filed in a supplemental report.Implant migration and occlusion of unintended vessel are listed in the device labeling as potential complications / adverse events.Reference #: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Patient was treated for a splenic artery aneurysm measuring 2.5 - 3 cm.A lobo-7 device was deployed in the splenic artery distal to the aneurysm and migrated into an upper pole branch of the splenic artery.The device could not be retrieved with a snare and the physician elected to leave it in place.The aneurysm was successfully treated with lobo-9 and embolic coils.The spleen was partially infarcted, but no long-term effects to splenic function are anticipated by the physician.Patient was discharged following the procedure with pain medication.The patient returned to the hospital and was admitted for pain management.During hospitalization, the patient was treated for pain and fluid overload (including pulmonary edema), and was subsequently discharged.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Angiographic images were sent to the manufacturer and evaluated.Based on the image and dimensional analysis, it was determined that the lobo-7 device was placed in a vessel larger than indicated for use.The investigation concluded that the implant migration was attributed to inadvertent use error and there is no evidence to indicate the presence of a potential quality issue with respect to manufacturing, design, or labeling.Reference #: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LOBO VASCULAR OCCLUDER
Type of Device
VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OKAMI MEDICAL INC.
8 argonaut
suite 100
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer (Section G)
INCEPTUS MEDICAL LLC
8 argonaut
suite 100
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
jill delsman
8 argonaut
suite 100
aliso viejo, CA 92656
9494469710
MDR Report Key17376052
MDR Text Key319663484
Report Number3016444913-2023-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00850008222030
UDI-Public01008500082220301023D000
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K220383
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/29/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/24/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/11/2023
Device Model NumberLOBO-7
Device Catalogue NumberLOBO-7
Device Lot Number23D0002
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/11/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/11/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
CERENOVUS ENVOY 6 FR GUIDING CATHETER.
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age55 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-