• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ALCUNK00059
Device Problem Defective Device (2588)
Patient Problem Fibrosis (3167)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.Literature: creagmile j et al,hydrus microstent implantation with omni surgical system ab interno canaloplasty for the management of open-angle glaucoma in phakic patients refractory to medical therapy; american journal of ophthalmology case reports 29 (2023) 101749.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
A literature article published with a purpose to report a series of 8 phakic eyes of 8 patients with open angle glaucoma with uncontrolled intraocular pressure on maximum tolerable medical therapy receiving company microstent implants combined with concomitant omni surgical system ab interno canaloplasty.A 37-year-old asian male with juvenile open angle glaucoma (joag) was referred to the glaucoma service for evaluation and management.In the operative eye, the patient had a pre-treatment maximum iop of 40 mmhg, and examination revealed c/d of 0.9 with inferior rim thinning.Gonioscopy was significant for a 1 clock hour patch of inferior peripheral anterior synechiae (pas) inferiorly, as well as postoperative changes from previous glaucoma surgery (described below).Hvf demonstrated an md of - 17.53 db, a psd of 11.73 db, and a dense superior arcuate defect.Oct (optical coherence tomography) revealed an average rnfl (retinal nerve fiber layer) thickness of 59m with a superior thickness of 60m and an inferior thickness of 57m.Ganglion cell analysis (gca)showed a global ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (gcipl) thickness of 64m.The patient had a past history of trabeculectomy and iridectomy with mitomycin c, which subsequently fibrosed and failed.The patient then underwent repeat trabeculectomy with company shunt placement which again failed due to aggressive fibrosis.There are two medical device reports associated with this patient.This report is associated with the company model shunt type.Literature: creagmile j et al,hydrus microstent implantation with omni surgical system ab interno canaloplasty for the management of open-angle glaucoma in phakic patients refractory to medical therapy; american journal of ophthalmology case reports 29 (2023) 101749.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No data regarding product identity was received i.E.No lot or serial number were indicated for the event therefore a complaint history review, non-conformance review and dhr review could not be performed.A sample was not received at the manufacturing site for evaluation; therefore, the condition of the product could not be evaluated.A root cause for the customers reported event could not be determined as no sample was received at investigation site.No supporting data was presented, obtained or identified while investigation concluding product contributing factors are related to the event.Product malfunction or cause could not be determined with relation to the event.Relationship of the product to the event is unclear.Reported event could not be conformed.Complaint is related to literature.Manufacturing site investigations include the review and inspection of the technical aspect of the company gfd (glaucoma filtration device) product.Reported event includes mainly results of company gfd product implementation.Article does not emphasize the technical scenarios of events or issues relating specifically to the company product.However mainly mentions the device implementation as one of the glaucoma treatments.No data regarding products identity nor product samples were received.Due to the above, no additional action can be executed by manufacturing site.Addition follow up for related event codes will be made during the annual post production risk review (pprr).The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE
Type of Device
IMPLANT, EYE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS  90850
Manufacturer (Section G)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS   90850
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key17425053
MDR Text Key320056476
Report Number3003701944-2023-00015
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K012852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/29/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/31/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberALCUNK00059
Device Lot NumberASKU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age37 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-