• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 300 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 300 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 300 D
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Bowel Perforation (2668)
Event Date 07/03/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The involved esu was inspected/tested.The unit was found to be functioning as intended upon repairing damage to the generator that occurred during transportation.The evaluation included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features and a power output check.The esu was/is within specifications and all features were/are functioning properly.In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history record (dhr) of the involved device.In conclusion, no erbe equipment problem was found that would have caused or contributed to the incident.Anatomically, the removal of a flat lesion (polyp) can be challenging.A perforation is a rare but serious complication in the removal of lesions/polyps during a colonoscopy.A thermal injury (e.G., from hf-current) and/or mechanical injury (e.G., from the accessory) cannot be excluded as potential factors in the incident.However, no conclusive determination could be made as to the cause of the event.No trends have been identified and erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this incident.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with the electrosurgical unit (esu/generator) upon a colonoscopy and an endoscopic mucosa resection (emr) to remove a flat polyp in the colon.The esu was used with a heynovo polypectomy snare (part number ws-2423d520, lot number 220727029).The setting of the esu was the endocut mode but the setting details were not provided.Additionally, it was reported that there were difficulties with the delivery of energy (i.E., cut and coagulation); even though the snare was correctly positioned with polyp.After removing the polyp, the resection site looked unremarkable.Nevertheless, a clip was placed at the site.Approximately 24 hours post-intervention, the patient went to the emergency room.During a second colonoscopy, a perforation was detected in the descending colon next to the emr site (i.E., where the flat lesion was removed).The perforation was about 15 mm in size.The hole was closed using a clip and then laparoscopically covered with an omental patch.The patient was then hospitalized for six (6) to seven (7) days.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 300 D
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM  72072
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM   72072
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-8764
7709554400
MDR Report Key17433982
MDR Text Key320171839
Report Number9610614-2023-00047
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
K083452
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/01/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 300 D
Device Catalogue Number10140-100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/13/2023
Date Manufacturer Received07/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/11/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age58 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight90 KG
-
-