STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH RESTORATION ADM X3 INS 28/48; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, NON-POROUS, CALICU
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 7236-2-848 |
Device Problems
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
Event Date 07/14/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.H3 other text : device not returned to the manufacturer.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient's left hip was revised.Patient presented to the er with a dislocation.A closed reduction was attempted and was unsuccessful.During the revision, the poly insert was found to have dissociated from the femoral head and dislocated from the metal liner.The poly insert, femoral head and stem were revised (stem was revised to add version to the hip construct).The metal liner and shell were retained.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient's left hip was revised.Patient presented to the er with a dislocation.A closed reduction was attempted and was unsuccessful.During the revision, the poly insert was found to have dissociated from the femoral head and dislocated from the metal liner.The poly insert, femoral head and stem were revised (stem was revised to add version to the hip construct).The metal liner and shell were retained.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event regarding disassociation and dislocation involving an adm liner was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned device indicated that the rim of the inner diameter of the liner is slightly deformed.Minor scratches are observed in the inner diameter.The observed surface characteristics appear consistent with damage sustained from the dislocation event and/or the explantation attempt.Clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.Product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to disassociation of the ceramic head from the adm poly liner and dislocation of the adm poly liner from the mdm metal liner.Visual inspection of the returned devices indicated that the head and liner were damaged from the disassociation/dislocation event as well as explantation.Further information such as pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.It was reported that the stem was also revised to add version to the hip construct; it is likely that the choice of stem implant contributed to the construct failure 3 days post-operative.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|