• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 LATEX FOLEY CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 LATEX FOLEY CATHETER Back to Search Results
Device Problem Inaccurate Flow Rate (1249)
Patient Problem Abdominal Pain (1685)
Event Date 07/13/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event was inconclusive because no sample was returned.It is unknown whether the device had met relevant specifications.It was unknown whether the product had caused the reported failure.The potential root cause for this failure could be operator¿s error- missed plug the catheters into the spigot on the manifold and cause occluded drainage eye (reduced flow rate).The lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.Unable to review the labelling due to unknown product code.Although the product family is unknown, the foley catheter ifus are found to be adequate based on past reviews.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was a regular problem with bard foley catheters for a while within the intensive care department.Stated that they were not draining properly (batch# unk) or were clogged (batch # unk) and therefore the patients got a full bladder.Last week, a patient who had 1300 cc in the bladder and had a catheter, when removed the balloon looked a bit strange (batch# unk).It went well for a while, but last fall they also had three patients (batch# unk).Per follow-up information received from (b)(6) on 13jul2023, stated that the balloon looked a bit strange meant that the balloon looked adhered and was also bloody but that could also be from the patient.For this case, they had now seen only one patient but the lot number could not be traced.As for the catheters that were not draining properly, they did not know the lot number or the number of patients that had this issue.However, they often had to siphon to empty the bladder properly, could be due to the catheter but also the urimeter.As for the catheters that were clogged, they did not had any idea about the lot number or the number of patients that had this issue.As for the previous problems, none were reported except for one that was.In that patient, it was typical that they did urinate 30-40 cc, but had abdominal pain.They took out the catheter and at that point the urine poured out and the abdominal pain disappeared.No medical intervention was reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LATEX FOLEY CATHETER
Type of Device
FOLEY CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer Contact
xeeroy rada
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key17443651
MDR Text Key320251021
Report Number1018233-2023-05731
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
PMA/PMN Number
K910846
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/02/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-