As reported, prior to an unspecified procedure, the user opened the marketing box of the 'ngage nitinol stone extractor' and found the package was not sealed.The issue with this device was discovered prior to patient contact and the device was not used on a patient.Another same device was used to complete the procedure.The patient did not experience any adverse effects as a result of the issue.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.E1: customer name and address = phone: (b)(6).G4: pma/510(k) number = exempt.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Event description: as reported, prior to an unspecified procedure, the user opened the marketing box of the 'ngage nitinol stone extractor' and found the package was not sealed.The issue with this device was discovered prior to patient contact and the device was not used on a patient.Another same device was used to complete the procedure.The patient did not experience any adverse effects as a result of the issue.Investigation ¿ evaluation: a visual inspection and functional testing of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record (dhr), manufacturing instructions, the instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures.One ngage nitinol stone extractor was returned in its original marketing box.No pouch was returned, preventing an investigation of the reported open seal.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Because there were no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing and quality control documents was conducted.All packages, including the seal, are inspected for particulate during manufacturing and quality inspection steps.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: suggested handling instructions for extractors and forceps caution: sterile if the package is unopened or undamaged.Do not use if package is broken.The pouch was not returned.Without the pouch available for investigation, it was not possible to determine the nature or cause of the issue.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|