• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTICARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTICARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 209999
Device Problem Calibration Problem (2890)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/17/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During the case the pt registration would not pass due to the segmentations rotation being off, this was making the bone model turn to its side.This cause the surgeon guide pattern to align over the side of the femur instead of the anterior like it should have.Case was cancelled, pt will have to return on a later date for the tka.Case type / application: tka.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event an event regarding segmentation issue involving a mako tka software was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results -product evaluation and results: based on a review of the scans provided by the mps, 1.Patient¿s leg was not rotated correctly when they were scanned 2.The motion rod was placed underneath the patient¿s improperly rotated leg rather than on the lateral side best practice is for the mps to review the scan before submitting to the segmentation team.-clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.-product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there are no other complaints with a similar failure mode for this lot.Conclusions: the alleged failure mode was confirmed to have been caused by user error.No additional investigation or specific actions are required.If additional information is received then the complaint will be reopened.
 
Event Description
During the case the pt registration would not pass due to the segmentations rotation being off, this was making the bone model turn to its side.This cause the surgeon guide pattern to align over the side of the femur instead of the anterior like it should have.Case was cancelled, pt will have to return on a later date for the tka.Case type / application: tka.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO® ROBOTICARM - MICS
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
3365 enterprise ave
weston FL 33331
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
3365 enterprise ave
weston FL 33331
Manufacturer Contact
kelsey williams
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key17478093
MDR Text Key320574652
Report Number3005985723-2023-00125
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486030407
UDI-Public00848486030407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K141989
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/08/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number209999
Device Lot NumberROB161
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/29/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight108 KG
-
-