• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ELUVIA DRUG-ELUTING VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ELUVIA DRUG-ELUTING VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number 24653
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
E1 - initial reporter facility name: (b)(6) hospital.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the stent was partially deployed and was elongated as a result.An additional device was required to adequately treat the lesion.An eluvia eu, 6x120, 130 cm was selected for use in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty procedure.The mildly tortuous target lesion was located in the superficial femoral artery (sfa) and was reported to have moderate calcification and 80% stenosis.Using a 0.014 non-boston scientific guidewire and a contralateral approach, the physician first deployed a non-boston scientific drug eluting stent in the p2 segment, and the first eluvia 6x120, before attempting to deploy the second eluvia.During deployment, the stent did not deploy completely, leaving approximately 10mm undeployed.The thumbwheel continued to spin freely.At this point, the physician observed that the guidewire was stuck in the catheter.The physician pulled the pull-grip, but the stent remained partially deployed.At this time, the physician disassembled the handle of the eluvia deployment system to attempt to deploy the stent, but the issue persisted.The physician cut the outer sheath and removed the handle to deploy the stent.The stent deployed but was elongated to approximately 130mm and the stent structure appeared weak on angiography.The physician elected to add an additional bare-metal stent next to the eluvia.The procedure was completed, and there were no reported patient complications.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the stent was partially deployed and was elongated as a result.An additional device was required to adequately treat the lesion.An eluvia eu, 6x120, 130 cm was selected for use in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty procedure.The mildly tortuous target lesion was located in the superficial femoral artery (sfa) and was reported to have moderate calcification and 80% stenosis.Using a 0.014 non-boston scientific guidewire and a contralateral approach, the physician first deployed a non-boston scientific drug eluting stent in the p2 segment, and the first eluvia 6x120, before attempting to deploy the second eluvia.During deployment, the stent did not deploy completely, leaving approximately 10mm undeployed.The thumbwheel continued to spin freely.At this point, the physician observed that the guidewire was stuck in the catheter.The physician pulled the pull-grip, but the stent remained partially deployed.At this time, the physician disassembled the handle of the eluvia deployment system to attempt to deploy the stent, but the issue persisted.The physician cut the outer sheath and removed the handle to deploy the stent.The stent deployed but was elongated to approximately 130mm and the stent structure appeared weak on angiography.The physician elected to add an additional bare-metal stent next to the eluvia.The procedure was completed, and there were no reported patient complications.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
E1: initial reporter facility name: (b)(6) hospital.Device analysis: returned product consisted of an eluvia self-expanding stent system with an unknown 0.014 in.Guidewire stuck in the device.The outer sheath, tip, inner sheath, and the remainder of the device were checked for damage.Visual examination revealed that the pull rack was separated 10.6 cm.From the knob.The outer sheath was separated 1.8 cm.From the nosecone.The tip, distal end of the middle sheath, distal end of the outer sheath, distal end of proximal inner liner, and distal end of inner liner were all missing.The outer sheath was kinked at the nosecone.Microscopic examination revealed no additional damages.X-ray of the device showed that the proximal inner liner was prolapsed.Inspection of the remainder of the device revealed no other damage or irregularities.Product analysis found damage that would have contributed to the froze on wire, deployment issue, and stent deformation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ELUVIA DRUG-ELUTING VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
ballybrit business park
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key17481952
MDR Text Key320657609
Report Number2124215-2023-41107
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeKS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/08/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number24653
Device Catalogue Number24653
Device Lot Number0030091697
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/29/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/05/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-