It was reported by the customer in colombia that during an unknown procedure on an unknown date, an fms tornado micro handpiece with buttons device was used.According to the report, the handpiece was overheating during use.It was further reported that the tip of the blade remained inside the handpiece and only the external part could be extracted from it.It was unknown how the procedure was completed.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary a video was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.The depuy synthes mitek team conducted a visual inspection of the returned video.Upon visual inspection of the video, it was observed that the blade was stuck in the handpiece, and it was not possible to dissembled, this condition can be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device (b)(4)., and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The device is required for service evaluation, the video provided does not contain enough evidence to determine why the customer experienced the failure, hands on analysis should provide the required evidence to provide a root cause.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|