• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR SOFT3D DETACHABLE 10; PERIPHERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR SOFT3D DETACHABLE 10; PERIPHERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number MV-HS00310
Device Problems Material Fragmentation (1261); Unraveled Material (1664); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported after embolization of a coil at the right bronchial artery with six coils, the incident occurred when the right seventh costal artery was attempted to be embolized.The coil was attempted to be detached after placement at the target site (seventh intercostal artery) through a competitor microcatheter but could not be detached.When the coil was pulled back, the implant remained at the target site, and the pusher was withdrawn.The implant separated at the transition zone between the soft zone and the support zone of the pusher.The soft zone of the pusher, remained in the angiographic catheter (5fr, 100cm) and was checked under fluoroscopy to avoid cutting the pusher, and a cut was made in the proximal part of the microcatheter to insert a pta balloon, to retrieve the pusher.The pta balloon was inserted to fix the pusher, and the pusher was attempted to be withdrawn along with the angiographic catheter.As it was thought that the implant had not detached normally and was cut in the middle, a sheath was replaced with a larger sheath (8fr), and the stretched part of the implant of the coil floating in the aorta was entwined with a snare and retrieved from the puncture site.As the stretched implant was not visible under fluoroscopy, it was confirmed by ct.The ct showed that a portion of the implant attempted to embolize the seventh intercostal artery, was stretched and remained in the aorta for approximately 3cm.In addition, there were small implant fragments remaining in the right inferior femoral artery and left internal iliac artery, but the physician did not consider that this to be a clinical problem and determined to monitor the patient.The physician palpated the right and left ankles to check blood flow and determined that there was no problem.The patient was not in serious condition and recovered.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Procedural notes or medical imaging were not provided.The investigation is ongoing.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental mdr will be submitted.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies premature coil detachment as potential complications associated with use of the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation conclusion the investigation of the returned coil system found the pusher returned without the implant attached, but no indications of activation using a detachment controller was observed on the pusher heater coil.Further inspection found the pusher bodycoil stretched, damaged, and broken at the transition point.The pusher bodycoil was also found stretched at the middle section, and the hypotube was kinked at several locations.The implant was returned stretched, broken into pieces, and entangled with an orange-colored object observed in the middle of the implant.The orange-colored object is consistent with hydrogel that has absorbed blood from the procedure.The investigation found the pusher's monofilament with a tensile break shape at the tip, which is consistent with the device experiencing force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to separate from the pusher.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces over specification.Due to the break condition of the returned pusher, this investigation could not test the continuity or resistance of the pusher to determine if a condition existed in the pusher electrical circuit that would have caused or contributed to the initial instance of non-detachment described in the reported event.The pusher was found with a clean, precise appearance at the site of the break, consistent with a cut.The event description states the physician checked the pusher under fluoroscopy to avoid cutting it, but as the pusher is made of stainless steel, which is not very visible under fluoroscopy, it may be possible the pusher was cut mistakenly during the procedure.However, as the returned angiographic catheter was found cut at a separate location proximal to the pusher transition break, and as the microcatheter used in the procedure was not returned for evaluation to verify the location of its cut and compare it to the location of the pusher break, this investigation had insufficient information to definitively determine the cause of the pusher's break condition.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AZUR SOFT3D DETACHABLE 10
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise drive
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise drive
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key17485565
MDR Text Key320652248
Report Number2032493-2023-00887
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier04987892128349
UDI-Public(01)04987892128349(11)221118(17)271031(10)0000289347
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K161367
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/09/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMV-HS00310
Device Lot Number0000289347
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/02/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/18/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-