• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Gradient Increase (1270); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Dyspnea (1816); Dizziness (2194); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 07/19/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional narratives: surgical / percutaneous intervention is indicated or performed, or harm occurred due to the device, or there is a device malfunction that could cause or contribute to a serious injury.This event is considered a serious injury.H3: product evaluation.Customer reports of stenosis and calcification were confirmed.The x-ray demonstrated commissure 1 was bent outward and cocr band remained intact; the vfit cocr alloy band was not expanded.X-ray also demonstrated calcification nodules on leaflet 1.Moderate host tissue overgrowth encroached onto the tissue and into the orifice at the greatest distance of approximately 7mm on leaflet 3 at the inflow aspect.Minimal host tissue overgrowth encroached onto the tissue and into the orifice at the greatest distance of approximately 3mm on leaflet 1 at the outflow aspect.Host tissue overgrowth on the stent circumference was moderate at the outflow aspect.Host tissue overgrowth and calcification restricted leaflet mobility and led to stenosis.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a 21mm aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of 1 year, 9 months due to severe stenosis and calcification.A 21mm valved conduit was implanted in replacement.As reported the alleged valve seemed to be structurally intact, with free moving leaflets on non-coronary and right coronary cusps while calcification was noted at base of left coronary cusp.Per product evaluation moderate pannus, minimal calcification, and stenosis were confirmed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional narratives: updated b5, b7, and h6 per new information received.
 
Event Description
It was reported and later learned through investigation that a 11500a 21mm aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of 1 year, 9 months due to severe stenosis caused by moderate host tissue overgrowth and minimal leaflet calcification.The patient presented with dyspnea on exertion and dizziness.A 11060a 21mm valved conduit was implanted in replacement.As reported the alleged valve seemed to be structurally intact, with free moving leaflets on non-coronary and right coronary cusps while calcification was noted at base of left coronary cusp.Per product evaluation, host tissue overgrowth and calcification restricted leaflet mobility and led to stenosis.The submitted echo images confirm the absence of extensive calcification of the bioprosthesis leaflets.Anatomically, bioprosthesis leaflet opening appears to be moderately and symmetrically reduced; it is possible that this degree of anatomic narrowing could have resulted in more significant (severe) hemodynamic aortic stenosis, but this cannot be confirmed in the absence of spectral doppler hemodynamic interrogation.Although no soft-tissue-density masses suggestive of pannus are visualized in association with the bioprosthesis, echocardiography (including tee) has poor sensitivity for the visualization of pannus, and its presence cannot be excluded.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and showed that this device met all manufacturing and sterilization specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional narratives updated h6 per new information received the most likely cause is patient factors, including history of coronary artery bypass graft (cabg) and history of bicuspid valve.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
one edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key17493199
MDR Text Key320751428
Report Number2015691-2023-15137
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194975
UDI-Public(01)00690103194975(17)250505(11)210506217799372
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/09/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number11500A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/21/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/06/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age47 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-