A facility reported that after positioning the patient with the mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059) fixed, the surgeon wanted to test if the clamp was fixed properly and tried to move both arms of the clamp in opposite directions.When doing that the forcescrew went down from 35 to 25.The device was in contact with the patient; however, there was no injury.The event led to increased surgery time for 5 minutes.
|
The mayfield skull clamp (a1059) was returned for evaluation: device history record (dhr) - the dhr was reviewed, and no anomalies related to the reported failure was observed.Failure analysis - the investigation of the returned device showed that the skull clamp had play in its swivel lock and there was an accumulation of residue.Adjustment required replacing some worn internal parts.The ratchet extension cannot be unlocked properly and got stuck in certain positions; the piston assembly does not move smoothly, the piston pin needed to be replaced and the assembly overhauled.The heli-coil insert protrudes from the ratchet extension, and this is a material defect and must be replaced.As a preventative measure, the torque screw is replaced.The damaged/worn parts were replaced along with general maintenance as the device was under repair for the first time.Root cause - the complaint is confirmed via inspection of the unit.The heli-coil was protruding from the ratchet extension and there was play in the swivel lock and residue buildup present.Probable root cause of the observed device defects is improper seating of the heli-coil and routine wear and tear.Additionally, improper or suboptimal placement of the skull clamp can lead to movement or slippage of the skull clamp and patient.No further investigation is required based on the acceptability of risk and no adverse trends were identified.This will be monitored and trended going forward.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|