Catalog Number 385100 |
Device Problem
Gas/Air Leak (2946)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/25/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Unknown manufacturer: there are multiple bd locations where this unspecified bd device may have been manufactured.A lot number could not be confirmed for this incident and without this information we are unable to determine where the device was manufactured.Therefore, bd corporate headquarters in franklin lakes, nj has been listed in sections d.3.And g.1.And the franklin lakes fda registration number has been used for the manufacture report number.D.4.Medical device expiration date: unknown.H.4.Device manufacture date: unknown.H3.A device evaluation is anticipated but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was repoted that 6 of the bd q-syte luer access split septum's were leaking.The following was received from the initial reporter: qsytes air leakage.It happen 6 times during preparation - the 7th time was sucessful.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that 6 of the bd q-syte luer access split septum's were leaking.The following was received from the initial reporter: qsytes air leakage.It happen 6 times during preparation - the 7th time was successful.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following fields were updated due to additional information: d10: device available for eval yes.D10: returned to manufacturer on: 08-sep-2023.Bd received three q-syte units from and unknown lot for evaluation.A review of the device history record could not be performed as the reported lot was unknown and could not be identified from the returned units.Our quality engineer visually inspected the returned units and observed no physical defects or deformities.Next, the engineer performed a leak test on each unit, but no leakage was observed coming from the devices once connected to extension tubing.Finally, the engineer disassembled each device and inspected the column walls and septum slits.No damage was observed the devices and their components.Therefore, based off the visual inspection and testing the engineer was unable to verify the reported defect.Since no defects were found during inspection a definitive root cause could not be determined.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|