A patient contact reported that a peritoneal dialysis (pd) patient was currently in the hospital.Upon follow up, the peritoneal dialysis registered nurse (pdrn) was unaware of hospitalization.The pdrn indicated that the patient had history of peritonitis and recently had an infection.The pdrn stated that the patient had lower abdominal pain and the patient's catheter was replaced.Upon further follow up, the pdrn reported that the patient was hospitalized on (b)(6)2020 for peritonitis.The pdrn stated that the patient presented to the emergency room with severe abdominal pain, a peritoneal effluent fluid culture and cell count (results not provided) was obtained.The pdrn stated that the patient was given a single dose of intraperitoneal antibiotics in the emergency room, and the decision was made to pull the patient's pd catheter (not a fresenius product).On (b)(6)2020, the patient's pd catheter was surgically removed, and a temporary hemodialysis (hd) catheter (not a fresenius product) was placed.The pdrn stated that patient began hd on (b)(6)2020 without issue.The pdrn stated that the patient's peritoneal effluent fluid cultures returned positive for staphylococcus aureus, and the pdrn attributed cousality to a breach in aseptic technique.The pdrn stated that the patient reportedly stuck their finger in their pd catheter because they ran out of caps.Per the pdrn, the events are unrelated to the utilization of any fresenius product(s), drug(s) or device(s).The pdrn stated that the patient remains hospitalized and is recovering from the events.On (b)(6)2020, the patient's pd catheter was replaced, as the patient wishes to return to pd therapy upon discharge.(b)(4).This report reflects information received by fda in the form of a notification per 803.22 (b)(2).
|