BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION JETSTREAM XC ATHERECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, PERIPHERAL, ATHERECTOMY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 45007 |
Device Problem
Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/02/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the device rotation could not be deactivated.A 2.1mm jetstream xc catheter was selected for use in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).The device was successfully used to cut through the lesion in blades down mode.When the physician then attempted to turn the device blade rotation off, the blades continued to rotate.The entire system was then disconnected from the power supply to turn off the device.The procedure was completed using an alternative method.There were no patient complications.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the device rotation could not be deactivated.A 2.1mm jetstream xc catheter was selected for use in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).The device was successfully used to cut through the lesion in blades down mode.When the physician then attempted to turn the device blade rotation off, the blades continued to rotate.The entire system was then disconnected from the power supply to turn off the device.The procedure was completed using an alternative method.There were no patient complications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluation by manufacturer: the returned product to boston scientific consisted of a jetstream xc-2.1 atherectomy catheter.The device was visually and microscopically examined for any shaft damage.Visual examination showed a bend on the catheter shaft located 77.5cm from the tip and a severe kink located at the strain relief of the device.The device was set up and functionally tested per the instructions for use (ifu).The device primed; however, no tip rotation was seen.The severe kink at the strain relief most likely severed the drive shaft or damaged it enough to where the tip would not rotate.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The complaint of the device having electrical issues and not stopping after releasing the button was not confirmed; however, shaft damage was confirmed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|