Measure: this issue only impacted this specific device.Analyze: cas, reviewed the open call for (b)(6).Case #(b)(6): adequate suction and suction ring placement.No noteworthy movement found throughout the entirety of procedure.1 ak planned, 38-degree arc at axis 97 with radius 4.0.Patient anatomy (eyelid) resulted in poor localized imaging thus aborting ak planned.Laser functioned as designed.Noteworthy lens bag tilt (eye tilt) noted on scheimpflug scans with two scheimpflug scans were blocked due to patient anatomy (nose shadow).Laser functioned as designed completing capsulotomy in frame 12, fragmentation in frame 39, and ak in frame 51.Root cause: laser functioned as designed.Patient head positioning reason for scheimflug scans noting lens bag tilt.No further follow up.
|
On (b)(6) 2023, dr.(b)(6).Reported to cas that she noticed an "anterior leaf rent" during procedure id# (b)(6).She stated that during the ia (irrigation/aspiration) portion of the procedure, she noted a possible rupture due to the flow of the fluid seeming" uneven".She then stated that after removing "half of the nucleus" she noticed the "leaf rent".
|