It was reported that, after thr surgery had been performed in 2006, the patient experienced infection.This adverse event was solved by revision surgery in 2017, in which constrained liner was put in.Current health status of patient is unknown.
|
The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, as of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided for evaluation.It was noted within the attachments that further information is not available.Therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the reported infection.Additionally, the causal relationship between the device and the reported infection cannot be confirmed.The patient impact beyond the revision surgery could not be determined.However, it was reported the patient had a second revision about six years later.No further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.Device specific identifiers were not provided.Therefore, an evaluation of the manufacturing records, complaint history review, instructions for use, risk management file, prior actions and sterilization records review could not be performed.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include injury, patient condition and/or medical history.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|