• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC CATH PKGD: BERMAN 5 FR 80CM; CATHETER, FLOW DIRECTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC CATH PKGD: BERMAN 5 FR 80CM; CATHETER, FLOW DIRECTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number AI-07135
Device Problems Crack (1135); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/16/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn#(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that "during a procedure, the physician performed right ventricular angiography for the patient through the alleged unit by using a power injector.The injection pressure setting was lower than the maximum injection pressure indicated on ifu.A crack was observed at the catheter after injection which caused fluid leakage".Additional information received states that the settings were volume-10ml; flow-12ml/sec; rise time-0.3 secs; pressure limit- 500psi, and the leak was located at the proximal end of the catheter (outside of the patient).As a result, the operator removed the catheter and stopped performing further angiography.No medical intervention required.No patient harm or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The reported complaint that "a crack was observed at the catheter after injection which caused fluid leakage" was confirmed upon investigation of the returned sample.The customer returned for investigation was a 5fr.80cm berman catheter without the original packaging (inp-4).The sample was returned in a cardboard box and was in a sealed bio-hazard bag (inp-1, inp-2).Upon return, the catheter body was immediately noted ruptured near the junction hub; the body was noted ruptured from approximately 86.3cm to 86.9cm from the distal tip of the catheter (inp-7, inp-8).The inflation lumen stopcock was in the open position (inp-5).The recommended volume capacity of the balloon is 0.75cc (inp-5).The supplied control stroke syringe was not returned with the sample.Upon microscopic inspection, the balloon appeared typical; no damage or abnormalities were noted to the balloon (inp-6).No condensation was noted within the inflation lumen extension line.Spots of dried contrast media were noted within the injection lumen extension line.No blood was noted on the interior or the exterior surfaces of the returned sample.No other damage or abnormalities were noted.The inflation lumen was injected with 0.75cc of air using a lab inventory control stroke syringe.The balloon inflated symmetrically (anp-1, an p-2).Both sides of the balloon measured approximately 4mm each.The balloon did meet specifications per graphic of radius ratio less than or equal to 2.0.The inflation lumen was injected with 0.75cc of air using a lab inventory control stroke syringe.The balloon inflated symmetrically (anp-1, anp-2).The balloon deflated in less than 3 seconds when the syringe was removed per specification.No pull away was noted after the tug test.The balloon was placed in water and air was injected into the inflation lumen again.No leak was noted.The ruptured catheter body did not result in damage to the inflation lumen.The catheter's injection lumen was aspirated/flushed, and air was noted leaking from the damaged/ruptured catheter body (anp-3).Based on a review of the device history record (dhr), the product met specification upon release; however, the specifications were not met during the complaint investigation due to the ruptured catheter body.The probable root cause of the complaint was manufacturing related.Capa has been initiated under teleflex's quality system by the manufacturing site to further investigate this complaint issue.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for complaints of this nature.Other remarks: n/a.Corrected data: n/a.
 
Event Description
It was reported that "during a procedure, the physician performed right ventricular angiography for the patient through the alleged unit by using a power injector.The injection pressure setting was lower than the maximum injection pressure indicated on ifu.A crack was observed at the catheter after injection which caused fluid leakage".Additional information received states that the settings were volume-10ml; flow-12ml/sec; rise time-0.3 secs; pressure limit- 500psi, and the leak was located at the proximal end of the catheter (outside of the patient).As a result, the operator removed the catheter and stopped performing further angiography.No medical intervention required.No patient harm or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CATH PKGD: BERMAN 5 FR 80CM
Type of Device
CATHETER, FLOW DIRECTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC
morrisville NC
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
16 elizabeth drive
chelmsford MA 01824
Manufacturer Contact
kevin don bosco
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville 27560
MDR Report Key17666065
MDR Text Key322449659
Report Number3010532612-2023-00489
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYG
UDI-Device Identifier00801902002273
UDI-Public00801902002273
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeHK
PMA/PMN Number
K892530
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/31/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2024
Device Catalogue NumberAI-07135
Device Lot Number16F22L0062
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/25/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/22/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-