Additional information: h6 (health effect - clinical code, medical device problem code).H3, h6: it was reported that the plaintiff underwent a total hip arthroplasty revision surgery on the right hip.The patient underwent blood tests where cobalt and chromium levels were found to be elevated.This complication was treated by conducting a second revision surgery.During the procedure it was noticed that the cup looked a little bit on the anteverted side and there was no bone destruction and no soft tissue damage.The devices were explanted and replaced except for the femoral stem.The patient was taken to the recovery room in good condition.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the devices concerned was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.No other similar complaints have been identified for the sleeve and other similar complaints have been identified for the head and cup.This will continue to be monitored for the cup.This will continue to be monitored via routine trending for the head and sleeve, however it should be noted that these devices are no longer sold.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified for the sleeve and cup.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible for the head.No further escalation actions are required.The available medical documents were reviewed.Based on the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported squeaking, elevated cobalt and chromium levels, and intraoperative findings cannot be confirmed.However, the acetabular cup¿s ¿a little on the anteverted side¿ and slightly uncovered positioning cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor.The patient impact beyond the revision surgery cannot be determined.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|