|
Model Number UNK-NV-ONYX |
Device Problem
Entrapment of Device (1212)
|
Patient Problem
Hearing Impairment (1881)
|
Event Date 05/19/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Tashiro n., kawano h., hiraoka f., nakamura y., fukuda s., yano s., aikawa h., go y., kazekawa k., matsumoto m.Iatrogenic middle meningeal arteriovenous fistula during embolization: two case reports and literature review.Journal of stroke 2023.Doi: 10.1016/j.Jstrokecer literature review found reported of a defrictor microcatheter being partially trapped by the onyx solution.The patient developed pulsatile tinnitus in her left ear after the procedure.It was found that there was an irregular hyperintensity around the left middle meningeal artery in association with the transarterial embolization.The patient was brought back to the operating room on post operative day 3 for another endovascular procedure to treat the middle meningeal arteriovenous fistula to improve the patient tinnitus symptoms. after the procedure, no findings indicative of neurological deficits were observed, and the patient¿s left tinnitus disappeared. the authors reviewed 1 case of a patient treated for middle meningeal arteriovenous fistula using onyx embolic agent.The patient was 46 year old female. the following intra- or post-procedural outcomes were noted: 1) the defrictor catheter was partially trapped by the onyx.2) after the procedure, the patient became aware of pulsatile tinnitus in her left ear.Please see attached literature article.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
G2: citation: authors: tashiro n., kawano h., hiraoka f., nakamura y., fukuda s., yano s., aikawa h., go y., kazekawa k., matsumoto m.Iatrogenic middle meningeal arteriovenous fistula during embolization: two case reports and literature review.Journal of stroke 0.Doi: 10.1016/j.Jstrokecer.Earliest date of publication used for date of event.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|