• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL AMPLATZER PICCOLO; OCCLUDER, PATENT DUCTUS, ARTERIOSUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL AMPLATZER PICCOLO; OCCLUDER, PATENT DUCTUS, ARTERIOSUS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 9-PDAP-05-04-L
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems Hypoxia (1918); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 08/17/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2023, a 5mm x 4mm amplatzer piccolo occluder was selected for implant in a 4.3kg, 46 day old patient with the following patent ductus arteriosus (pda) dimensions: pda minimal diameter of 3.1-3.2mm, pda length of 7-9mm, pda diameter at the aortic ampulla 7.88mm.The delivery system was an unknown abbott delivery system.Given the large aortic ampulla, the decision was made to use a 5/4 piccolo occluder instead of the recommended 5/6 piccolo occluder.It was decided to use a shorter device to allow apposition of the distal disc.Transthoracic echocardiography (tte) was used during procedure.The device was deployed a couple of times.On tte and fluoroscopy, there was no impingement on the left pulmonary artery (lpa) or the aorta, and there was no residual shunt through the device.The piccolo pulse checklist was utilized.A push pull test was performed, and there was no movement of the device.The device was released from the delivery cable.The patient had a subsequent procedure for esophageal dilation.Prior to dilation, the device was still in place.After the esophageal dilation was performed, the patient needed to be reintubated.It was noted that the device had embolized to the lpa and caused a partial obstruction.The device was successfully retrieved via transcatheter snare out of the lpa without issue.The physician stated that the cause of the device embolization was believed to be due to the esophageal dilation.The patient status was reported as stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event of device embolization to the lpa causing partial obstruction after esophageal dilation was reported.It was also reported that 5-4 mm device was used instead of recommended 5-6 mm piccolo device due to the large aortic ampulla, to allow apposition of the distal disc.A review of the ductal measurements as reported from the field was performed.Per the sizing table in the instructions for use, arten600042307-d, sizing chart t2, the recommended device is 5-6 mm amplatzer piccolo occluder.A returned device assessment could not be performed as the device was not returned for analysis.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and the product met all specifications.Information from field indicated that the cause of the device embolization was believed to be due to the esophageal dilation.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to labeling design or manufacturing of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2023, a 5mm x 4mm amplatzer piccolo occluder was selected for implant in a 4.3kg, 46 day old patient with the following patent ductus arteriosus (pda) dimensions: pda minimal diameter of 3.1-3.2mm, pda length of 7-9mm, pda diameter at the aortic ampulla 7.88mm.The delivery system was an unknown abbott delivery system.Given the large aortic ampulla, the decision was made to use a 5/4 piccolo occluder instead of the recommended 5/6 piccolo occluder.It was decided to use a shorter device to allow apposition of the distal disc.Transthoracic echocardiography (tte) was used during procedure.The device was deployed a couple of times.On tte and fluoroscopy, there was no impingement on the left pulmonary artery (lpa) or the aorta, and there was no residual shunt through the device.The piccolo pulse checklist was utilized.A push pull test was performed, and there was no movement of the device.The device was released from the delivery cable.The patient had a subsequent procedure for esophageal dilation.Prior to dilation, the device was still in place.After the esophageal dilation was performed, the patient needed to be reintubated.It was noted that the device had embolized to the lpa and caused a partial obstruction.The device was successfully retrieved via transcatheter snare out of the lpa without issue.The physician stated that the cause of the device embolization was believed to be due to the esophageal dilation.The patient status was reported as stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AMPLATZER PICCOLO
Type of Device
OCCLUDER, PATENT DUCTUS, ARTERIOSUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL REG# 2135147
5050 nathan ln n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key17720802
MDR Text Key323090467
Report Number2135147-2023-03919
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAE
UDI-Device Identifier05415067031044
UDI-Public05415067031044
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P020024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/12/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/11/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number9-PDAP-05-04-L
Device Lot Number8132126
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/10/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age46 DA
Patient Weight4 KG
-
-