• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number NV UNK PIPELINE
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 06/02/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Li l, gao b-l, wu q-w, li t-x, shao q-j, chang k-t.Comparison of pipeline classic and flex embolization devices in endovascular performance for intracranial aneurysms.Medicine.2023;102(24):e34087.Doi:(b)(4).Medtronic literature review found a report of patient complications in association with pipeline embolization device.The purpose of this article was to investigate the endovascular performance of the pipeline classic embolization device (ped classic) and ped flex device (ped flex) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Fifty-three patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the ped classic were retrospectively enrolled into the ped classic group, and 118 patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the ped flex were enrolled into the ped flex group.In the ped classic group, 58 ped classic devices were implanted, and 26 aneurysms underwent coil embolization.The group included 16 male and 37 female patients with a mean age of 55.7 years.In the ped flex group, 126 ped flex devices were implanted, and 35 aneurysms underwent concomitant coil embolization.The group included 40 male and 78 female patients with a mean age of 54.2 years.The success rate of the stenting procedure was 100% in both groups.The following intra- or post-procedural outcomes were noted: pipeline classic:  - in one case the tip of the guidewire of the stent was separated and left at the bifurcation of the distal middle cerebral artery, which did not lead to aggravation of symptoms.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id nv unk pipeline (); product id nv unk pipeline (); product id nv unk flex (); g2: citation: authors: li, l., gao, b.-l., wu, q.-w., li, t.-x., shao, q.-j., chang, k.-t.Comparison of pipeline classic and flex embolization devices in endovascular performance for intracranial aneurysms.Medicine 102(24):e34087 2023.Doi:(b)(4).Earliest date of publication used for date of event no unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.See manufacturer report # 2029214-2023-01639 and 2029214-2023-01640 for other reports from this article.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIPELINE
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key17724351
MDR Text Key323919857
Report Number2029214-2023-01641
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/11/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNV UNK PIPELINE
Device Catalogue NumberNV UNK PIPELINE
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/22/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H10...
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-