• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION Back to Search Results
Lot Number VMFD260523
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Difficult to Advance (2920); Material Deformation (2976); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/16/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman procedure.The femoral groin access gained, along with a non-boston scientific introducer sheath (16 fr).Then, the mechanical guidewire was inserted into the femoral vein and anchored it in the superior vena cava.Once the versacross connect was loaded over the mechanical guidewire, a small bend was added, and it was inserted into the patient.Issues were noted while advancing the dilator over the mechanical guidewire, therefore the physician noted the mechanical guidewire was too tight for the dilator.It was felt that the dilator get stuck and an attempted to pull the mechanical guidewire out, which got stuck inside the dilator and it was unable to withdraw.The distal end of mechanical guidewire was protruding from the dilator.The mechanical guidewire was noted kinked.It seems that the guidewire was fully retrieved/recovered from patient anatomy (didn't look like a piece broke off).It does not seems that the coil or either end of the coil (if coil fractured) was able to be stretched freely.Hence, a second versacross connect kit was opened, which the physician mentioned the same mechanical guidewire tightness issue, however, it was used normally.No patient complications were reported.The procedure was completed successfully.The mechanical guidewire and dilator are expected to be returned for analysis.Additionally, nothing unusual with the patient anatomy was noted.The physician has mentioned that he noticed it in the past as well.The dilator was manually shaped prior to the insertion.No other issues were noted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION
Type of Device
DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC.
5959 trans-canada highway
montreal H4T 1 A1
CA  H4T 1A1
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC.
5825 explorer drive
mississauga, on L4W 5 P6
CA   L4W 5P6
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
dc a330
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key17726566
MDR Text Key323167117
Report Number2124215-2023-49073
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRE
UDI-Device Identifier00685447012597
UDI-Public00685447012597
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K220414
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/11/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Lot NumberVMFD260523
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/26/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-