• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: IMPERATIVE CARE. INC ZOOM REPERFUSION CATHETER; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

IMPERATIVE CARE. INC ZOOM REPERFUSION CATHETER; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER Back to Search Results
Model Number ICRC071137
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/16/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Imperative care, inc.Received the zoom 71 which had a third-party stent retriever trapped within the lumen of the catheter shaft.Investigation confirmed shaft breakage and suggested that an axial force was applied during the procedure resulting in compression of the distal segment as well as separation of it from the proximal segment of the catheter.The distal segment appeared buckled and crushed along its length.Investigation determined that the catheter jacket had broken and a section of coils that make up the catheter shaft at the break location became exposed.The exposed coils held the distal segment to the remainder of the catheter.Both the broken catheter jacket and exposed coils exhibited minimal stretching.Based on the reported complaint information, case images, and device investigation the most probable cause for the complaint is attributed to retraction of adjunctive devices against resistance within tortuous anatomy with a presence of calcification.The manufacturing records for the zoom 71 were reviewed and demonstrated that the product met all the design and manufacturing specifications.
 
Event Description
A 95-year-old female was treated for an occlusion in the m2 segment.The patient's anatomy exhibited tortuosity and calcification.Access was obtained with a guidewire and a zoom 88 access catheter.During the first pass, a zoom 35 followed by a zoom 71 catheter were advanced through the zoom 88.The zoom 71 was positioned at the face of the clot and then the zoom 35 was removed from the patient.Aspiration was applied to the zoom 71 and the catheter was then removed.A follow-up contrast run revealed residual clot remained.During the second pass, the same zoom 88 and zoom 71 were used.A third-party microcatheter, and stent retriever were advanced through the zoom 71 to the clot in the m2 segment.No aspiration was applied.The microcatheter, stent retriever, and zoom 71 were then removed.Another contrast run was performed, revealing residual clot.During the third pass, the same microcatheter, stent retriever, zoom 71 and zoom 88 were used.The zoom 88 was advanced to the distal m1 segment.The zoom 71 and stent retriever were advanced once again to the clot in the m2 segment.The clot was removed successfully.While retracting the stent retriever into the zoom 71 through the m2/m1 segment, the physician reported "some friction".As a result, the physician decided to remove the stent retriever and zoom 71 from the patient as a system.The entire system was then placed on the back table.Upon examining the zoom 71, it was discovered that a distal potion of the catheter shaft had separated with the stent retriever in the distal and proximal ends of the catheter.The physician believed the zoom 71 had fractured during removal from the m2/m1 segment due to the noted "friction".No kinks were observed on the access catheter.All components of the zoom 71 catheter and stent retriever were present; no parts were left inside the patient.The patient achieved complete reperfusion with a tici 3 score and remains in stable condition.No patient sequelae were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZOOM REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER
Manufacturer (Section D)
IMPERATIVE CARE. INC
1359 dell avenue
campbell CA 95008 6609
Manufacturer (Section G)
IMPERATIVE CARE, INC.
1359 dell avenue
campbell CA 95008 6609
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
1359 dell
campbell, CA 95008-6609
MDR Report Key17739646
MDR Text Key323323152
Report Number3014590708-2023-00028
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00812212030450
UDI-Public00812212030450
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K211476
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/13/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/13/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/17/2024
Device Model NumberICRC071137
Device Catalogue NumberICRC071137
Device Lot NumberF2304602
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/07/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/17/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ARISTOTOLE 24 GUIDEWIRE; EMBOTRAP STENT RETRIEVER; HEADWAY 27 MICROCATHETER; ZOOM 35; ZOOM 88
Patient Age95 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-