Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product deficiency directly related to the reported adverse event.The more likely cause of the perforation was related to the device being malpositioned deep within the myometrium but without a full thickness perforation at the time of the uit, which in turn was potentially secondary to under-dilation of the endocervical canal at the time of device insertion.The disposable handpiece used in this case was not returned and therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be performed.Device history was performed, the handpieces meet all qa specifications prior to being released, including adequate sterilization.The minerva es controller was returned and evaluated.Results of the evaluation indicated the controller passed the uit verification test and determined there was no device issue found and the controller/system operated as intended.Uterine perforations are known complications of an endometrial ablation procedure.Complications associated with perforations are addressed in the warning and caution sections of the operator's manual and instructions for use, including the statements: use caution not to perforate the uterine wall when sounding, dilating, or inserting the disposable handpiece.Activation of the minerva disposable handpiece in the setting of a uterine perforation is likely to result in serious patient injury.-excessive force applied during placement of the disposable handpiece may result in tissue injury, including perforation.Although designed to detect a perforation of the uterine wall, this test is an indicator only, and it might not detect all perforations.Clinical judgment must always be used.Post-treatment, any patient-reporting signs/symptoms that could indicate a serious complication, e.G., bowel injury, should be thoroughly evaluated without delay.As with all endometrial ablation procedures, serious injury or death can occur, including but not limited to, infection and injury to adjacent tissue, such as bowel, bladder, vagina, vulva, and/or perineum.
|
It was reported that six days after a minerva es endometrial ablation in-office procedure, the patient was admitted to the er with signs of acute abdomen.Ct was performed and free air was seen.Exploratory laparotomy, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, sigmoid colectomy with colostomy, cystoscopy (retrograde pyelogram - left) were performed.A uterine perforation was seen on a posterior wall of the uterus.After an uncomplicated post-operative course, the patient fully recovered and was discharged.
|